Blackmail/Extortion Letter sent to SCSCAI

Stan Bjonerud, your Email dated Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 7:59am defending and justifying a Blackmail/Extortion Letter sent to SCSCAI Board. You write, "This letter, written August 31, 2010 by six former board members regarding their concerns that has been published on SC-SCOOP chat line so is public information."  You go on to write, "I pass it on as it should provide you some background on the recent turmoil on our board and possibly answer some of the rumors".

You go on to say, "Personally, I feel the board is now taking to correct action to solve these matters and is doing so in accordance with the NRS 226 guidelines and regulations. The negative few are trying to create an issue out of these situation to criticize them and that is wrong. We need to support their efforts in difficult times." - Stan Bjonerud 

 

Mr. Bjonerud, I find your defense of these actions troublesome particularly page 4 (Highlighted) of "THE LETTER" you refer to; this is a blatant case of extortion and blackmail by  the unlawful demanding and obtaining of something through force by the signers - Richard Post --Ed Walterscheid ------Frank Beers, Jim Flynn, Bernard  Bronstein, Gary Conrath -  "THE LETTER" has all the qualifications to be covered under The RICO Act. I am amazed the you and the signers would let yourselves be involved in such a activity. Another troublesome matter is your justification of their actions, you say is in accordance with NRS 226 guidelines and regulations. (What are you talking about?) Maybe you should carefully reread "THE LETTER" particularly page 4.

QUESTION: 

• How can SCSCAI attract responsible leadership knowing that they are exposed to Blackmail and Extortion.
• Who are the we & who you are speaking of-"We need to support their efforts difficult times."? You know we are 7700 homeowners and you surely are not speaking for all 7700 of us, are you?

Dwain A. Kramzar

"THE LETTER"

 Dear Board Members: August 31, 2010           Page 4

  The solution to these problems is for President Steinman to immediately resign
from all of his roles in this community and spare himself and this community
from a very unpleasant series of events. We believe the Board must be proactive
in assuring that President Steimnan resigns. Absent President Steinman's
resignation we will take the following actions: we would first file a number of
resident complaints dealing with the above items with the Board to be heard at
the September meeting of the Board, second we would call an open meeting of the
Association to discuss in depth the items outlined above and any others that are
pertinent and third we would file with the Commission for the Common Interest
Communities and Condminium Hotels, Nevada Real Estate-Division (CICCH)
complaints on the Boards illegal actions. Beyond these steps we are prepared to
proceed in any legal manner available to complete our objective of restoring the
proper and legal functioning of our board and the return of proper management for staff.
  We will cease our protests on the foregoing subjects upon Mr. Steinman's resignations. He should resign on or before September 7,  2010.  
  
  Richard Post --Ed Walterscheid ------Frank Beers, Jim Flynn, Bernard
Bronstein, Gary Conrath