As far as your comment about responsibility, it has the appearance talking down this member to Ms Couar and your fellow Board members.
FYI I was prompted to run for the Board two times. Both times the motivation was to inform the membership that this HOA has refused to implement a Business Plan. At the Resident Form - Meet the Candidates Meeting there were eleven candidates that pledged their support for a Business Plan if elected. To date no plan has been implemented or talked about.
Mr. Crawford, I hope you realize that I have not only run for the Board I have attended more BoD meetings than some of the directors. A lot of these meetings were verry questionable.
Dwain Kramzar
(702) 582-8064
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Leo Crawford <cioconsulting@mac.com> wrote:
My impression of the discussion and the motion was that we would negotiate and if negotiations fell thru, we would rebid, with a preference for rebidding if in doubt.
Lets not forget it's "our" responsibility to do what we think is right, not Kramzer's. He can run for the Board too.
On Sep 26, 2012, at 8:26 AM, Barbara Cogar wrote:
> I did receive Mr. Kramzar's email, but he did not ask for clarification. He actually stated " Barbara, if there is a need for any clarifications do not hesitate to
>> give me a call.* After reading the blog, I did not feel that there was a need for clarification at that time. He also stated he copied the board on this same email so I assumed everyone had received it.
> Mr. Kramzar's blog was very informative, but I felt that the Board of Directors had made the decision to let Templeton continue with the reduced rent for six months and during that period of time would begin negotiations with them through the restaurant committee. I felt the blog was an informative tool that the restaurant committee would be able to use in the process.
>
>
> Barbara H. Cogar
> Executive Director
> Sun City Summerlin
> Community Association, Inc.
> (702) 966-1409
> barbarac@suncitylv.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Susan Papilion
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 6:26 PM
> To: Dwain Kramzar; Barbara Cogar
> Cc: Kenneth Caroccia; DON GELBMAN; Dick Danzak; LEO CRAWFORD; Bruce Alitt; Ellen Bachman; David Steinman; Board of Directors; My Sun City Summerlin-Blog
> Subject: Re: [My Sun City Summerlin-BLOG] Gaming Contract from the Gaming Vendor's perspective
>
> I am sorry but I must have missed your request of Barbara Cogar and therefore did not respond or follow-up, I am currently out of town but will return on Thursday and will be able to discuss your concerns. I believe Ken Carrocia is looking into the current lease with Templeton which is currently not working and will have suggestions from his gaming and restaurant committee. You are welcome to discuss your ideas and experience with him as well.
>
> Sue
>
> Sue \papilion
> ---- Dwain Kramzar <dkramzar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> *Ms. Barbara Cogar, S**CSCAI-Executive Director*
>> *
>> *
>> *Barbara, September 5, I sent you, with a Cc to the Board the attached
>> memo requesting clarification of **the rational used with the Agenda item, **X-2.
>> Discussion and motion regarding extending or renewing Templeton Gaming
>> Corporation's lease.** I am disappointed but not surprised this
>> request was ignored; this has been the normal procedure of the Board.
>> By ignoring the memberships request for clarification, the Board has
>> the appearance of covering up financial dealings that affect all the
>> membership of this HOA.*
>> *
>> *
>> *Barbara, I want to be clear, that I appreciate all the arrows you
>> dodged on behalf of the Board. The Board has to be accountable to the
>> membership.*
>> *
>> *
>>
>> *Dwain Kramzar *
>> (702) 582-8064
>>
>>
>>
>> *Ms. Barbara Cogar, S**CSCAI-Executive Director*
>>
>> *Barbara, I would like to follow up on our brief conversation before
>> the September 4, 2012 Board meeting. I shared three concerns
>> pertaining to our community. I am confident you will address these
>> concerns, however after setting through more than three hours of
>> rambling discussions I found it hard to understand the Board logic
>> when making decisions that affect the membership of SCSCAI,
>> particularly the rational used with the Agenda item, * *X-2.
>> Discussion and motion regarding extending or renewing Templeton Gaming
>> Corporation's lease.*
>> *
>> *
>> *This prompted me to forward you My BLOG titled; Gaming Contract from
>> the Gaming Vendor's perspective. It appears that anyone with any
>> experience with these types of arrangements are that our Board members
>> are more concerned with the Vendor's interest than the Memberships
>> interest.*
>> *
>> *
>> *Barbara, if there is a need for any clarifications do not hesitate to
>> give me a call.*
>> *
>> *
>>
>> *Dwain Kramzar*
>> (702) 582-8064
>>
>>
>>
>> *Gaming** Contract from the Gaming Vendor's perspective.* *by Dwain
>> Kramzar*
>> *
>> *
>> * This perspective is derived from my forty-five years of negotiating
>> hundreds of Vendor contracts, both written and oral, with Bars &
>> Pubs.(Sales) These contracts are an agreement entered into voluntarily
>> by the Vendor and the Location with the intention of creating a
>> profitable partnership.*
>> *
>> *
>> *Typically these partnerships are revenue sharing relationships
>> **(set % of revenues) **this is were the Vendor agrees to supply the
>> equipment, maintenance and service, the Location provides the floor space.
>> This arrangement is the most beneficial to both the Vendor and the
>> Location. Reasoning: 1. timely rotation of newer equipment 2. greater
>> promotional opportunities to maintain and increase revenues 3. a
>> better quality of service and maintenance 4. performance based revenues; the more
>> money the Vendor makes, the more money the Location makes. *
>> *
>> *
>> *Another agreement would be where the Vendor leases floor space from
>> the Location for a flat fee per month/year. The flat fee would be to
>> the Vendor's advantage; reasoning being 1. the Vendor has knowledge of
>> typical income from this type Location. 2. the Location normally
>> receives less income compared to an revenue sharing arrangement. 3.
>> the equipment has a longer Location life-span (less rotation of
>> equipment, less appealing to
>> players).*
>> *
>> *
>>
>> --
>> Posted By Blogger to My Sun City
>> Summerlin-BLOG<http://daksplace.blogspot.com/2012/09/gaming-contract-f
>> rom-gaming-vendors.html>at
>> 9/05/2012 03:12:00 PM
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment